Can we do תפילות prayers for: 
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig and Torah.org
That also through them The האור Light,  רפואה The Healing  and The ואהבה Love of ישועת  יהוה Yeshuath YHWH may come back to הארץ The  Land of Israel?
 
             
 |  |  | 
    |  | 
         | 
 | To sponsor an edition of the Rabbi Zweig on the Parsha e-mail list, click here |  | 
         | 
             |  |               |  |               |  |               |  |                Parshas Miketz & Chanukah      
          To Fergin or Forget
 
 
 | "...seven cows of beautiful appearance and robust flesh..." (41:2) 
 Pharaoh dreams that as he is standing over the Nile seven cows  "y'fos mareh" - "of beautiful appearance" and "briyos bassar" - "robust  flesh" emerge from the river. Subsequently, seven other cows, ugly and  gaunt, emerge and consume the beautiful and robust cows. Yoseif  interprets that the first seven cows represent seven years of abundance,  which are to be followed by seven years of famine, represented by the  second set of cows. Most of the commentaries see a correlation between  the cows and the Egyptian economy. Being an agricultural society,  Egypt's economic wellbeing is defined in terms of their livestock;  abundance results in well-fed animals while famine results in  malnourished animals.[1] However, Rashi chooses to explain the symbolism  in a different manner. Rashi's comment on the expression "y'fos mareh" -  "of beautiful appearance" is that it alludes to the years of "sovah",  when people will view each other favorably.[2] Clearly, Rashi is  teaching that the cows rep  resent the people and not the livestock owned by the Egyptians. What  prompts Rashi to interpret the verse differently than most of the other  commentaries? If, according to Rashi, the cows represent the people's  attitudes towards one another, how do we interpret the latter half of  the verse "briyos bassar" - "robust flesh"?
 
 The term used by the Torah for the years of plenty is "sova". Rashi  understands that "sova" does not only refer to abundance, but  contentment as well. Contentment is not gauged by the state of the  economy alone; it is a state of mind. If a person is able to view  another's success favorably, then he is truly content. Many people have  more resources than they will ever need, but still begrudge others their  success. They become so consumed with the success of others, that they  forget their own accomplishments and are therefore unable to find  satisfaction in the fruit of their labor.
 
 Therefore, Rashi identifies the "sova gadol" - "a time of great  contentment" as a time when people are able to view each other  favorably. This concept is alluded to by the seven cows "y'fos mareh" -  "of beautiful appearance". Rashi's interpretation is corroborated by the  comments made by the Midrash on the end of the verse "vatirenah b'achu"  - "and they were grazing in the marsh". The Midrash comments "ahava  ve'achva ba'olam" - "it is a time of love and brotherhood in the  world".[3]
 
 One person can view another favorably only if he sees himself in a  healthy light. Self-respect coupled with the ability to gauge ourselves  by our own accomplishments allows us the security to share in the  happiness and success of others. This is alluded to by the description  of the cows "briyos bassar" - "robust flesh", for they have a healthy  disposition.. If a person does not have self-respect and can only gauge  his own accomplishments in terms of others', he will be forever  threatened by their success and therefore never rejoice in his own.
 
 1.Ramban 41:2
 2.Rashi ibid.
 3.Bereishis Rabbah 89:4
 
 Welcome To The J.C.C Of Mt. Moriah
 
 The Mishna in Midos relates that the Greeks breached the walls  surrounding the Beis Hamikdash in thirteen places.[1] Chazal view these  breaches as symbolic of the chasm created by the Greeks within the  Jewish people as a result of their attempts to eradicate Torah  observance. The Talmud states that King Solomon was taken to task for  sealing breaches in the wall surrounding the Beis Hamikdash, for doing  so inhibited access to Jewish pilgrims.[2] If the breaches in the wall  allowed greater accessibility to the Beis Hamikdash, why were the  breaches created by the Greeks viewed in such a negative light?
 
 The Talmud states that two contributing factors in the death of the  ignorant is their reference to the "Holy ark" as "arna" - "a closet" and  naming their houses of worship "Beth Am" - "House of the People".[3]  Why are these actions considered shortcomings? What is the connection  between the two behaviors?
 
 In Hilchos Beis Habechira the Rambam records as the source of the  obligation to build the Beis Hamikdosh the verse in Parshas Teruma  "v'asu li mikdosh" - "make for Me a sanctuary".[4] The Lechem Mishna  comments that the Rambam appears to be contradicting himself, for in  Hichos Melachim the Rambam cites the verse "l'shichno sidreshu u'vasah  shama" - "you shall seek out His Presence and come there".[5] How do we  reconcile this contradiction?
 
 The Beis Hamikdosh served two main functions. In addition to  functioning as a place for Bnei Yisroel to serve Hashem, it was also the  center for the entire nation to gather three times a year to express  their unity and solidarity. The verses cited by the Rambam reflect these  two functions. The verse "l'shichno sidreshu u'vasah shama" - "you  shall seek out His Presence and come there" emphasizes the need for a  place for the nation to gather.[6] The Rambam cites this verse in  Hilchos Melachim together with the monarchial responsibilities, for the  king serves to unite the nation. In Hilchos Beis Habechira which records  the various elements of service found in the Beis Hamikdosh, the Rambam  records the verse "v'asu li mikdosh" - "make for Me a sanctuary" for  this reflects the requirement to have a place of service.[7] Both of  these requirements compliment one another for the only true unifying  force that the Jewish Nation has is their commitment to uphold their  spiritual heri  tage. It is because the Beis Hamikdosh is a place of service that it  can also function as the rallying point for Bnei Yisroel.
 
 The Levush explains that the reason why we celebrate Chanukah with  "hallel v'hoda'ah" - "praise and thanksgiving" whereas Purim is  celebrated by "se'udah u'mishteh" - "festive meals" is that the Greek  threat was not a physical one, rather an attempt to eradicate any  vestige of spirituality from our lives. Therefore, we celebrate in a  spiritual manner, "hallel v'hoda'ah". On Purim our physical existence  was at stake, prompting our celebrating in a physical manner.[8] The  Greeks were not attempting to destroy our national identity, rather they  wanted to preserve Judaism as a culture devoid of spirituality. The  breeches made to the Temple were to create greater accessibility to it.  The Temple was to serve as a great cultural center. All the rules and  regulations restricting entry to those who were spiritually contaminated  were to be abolished. No longer were the "archaic" laws of sanctity and  purity to be heeded. Such a course of action would be catastrophic to  the Jewish pe  ople, for without our commitment to spirituality we could not survive.  Under the leadership of Solomon, Bnei Yisroel had a king and Temple that  unified us spiritually. Since all laws of sanctity were being observed,  the decision to limit the pilgrims was merely political. Therefore,  limiting access to the Temple was the wrong course of action.
 
 The Talmud castigates those who name their houses of worship "Beth  Am" - "House of the People" for they fail to realize that it is the  worship that unifies the nation and not our culture. Similarly,  referring to the "Aron Hakodesh" as a "closet" reflects the view that  the Torah is no more than a mere cultural artifact, a history book. Jews  from different parts of the world do not share a common culture or  language. It is only their spiritual legacy and commitment that binds  them. By emphasizing culture over worship, the house of worship becomes a  glorified community center, slowly being drained of its spirituality.  It is then that the Maccabees' victory over the Hellenistic forces must  be re-examined.
 
 1.2:3
 2.Sanhedrin 101b
 3.Shabbos 32a
 4.1:1
 5.1:1
 6.Devarim 12:5
 7.Shemos 25:8
 8.Orech Chaim 670
 
 |  |    
       |  |  
                   |  |  
  | Questions or comments?  Email feedback@torah.org. 
 Join the Jewish Learning Revolution! Torah.org: The Judaism Site brings this and a host of other classes to you every                 week. Visit http://torah.org or email learn@torah.org  to get your own free copy of this mailing.
 
 
 Permission is granted to redistribute, but please give  proper attribution and copyright to the author and Torah.org.                 Both the author and Torah.org reserve certain rights.  Email  copyrights@torah.org  for full information.
 
 |  |  | 
 
  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment