Can we do תפילות prayers for: 
Rabbi Zweig and Torah.org
That also through them The האור Light,  רפואה The Healing  and The ואהבה Love of ישועת  יהוה Yeshuath YHWH may come back to הארץ The  Land of Israel?
 
 |  |  | 
    |  | 
         | 
 | To sponsor an edition of the Rabbi Zweig on the Parsha e-mail list, click here |  | 
         | 
             |  |               |  |               |  |               |  | Parshas Vayigash       Feel My Pain  
 | "I am Yosef. Is my father still alive?" (45:3) 
 When Yosef revealed himself to his brothers, the verse records that  the brothers were unable to answer him due to an overwhelming sense of  embarrassment. The Midrash teaches that from the brothers' reaction, it  is clear that Yosef was giving them "tochacha" - "reproof" for having  sold him.[1] This interpretation is further strengthened by the fact  that on several occasions the brothers mentioned that Yaakov was alive;  thus, Yosef's question must have had other implications..
 
 Many of the commentaries discuss how the words "Is my father still  alive" imply rebuke. Some understand that Yosef was really saying to  them, "How did you expect my father to survive after all the grief and  suffering you forced him to endure?" The Bais Halevi takes this  interpretation a step further. He understands that Yosef was chiding  Yehuda, saying, "You asked me to have mercy on your father and release  Binyamin; why is it that you yourselves did not show him mercy when you  sold me?"[2]
 
 The purpose of reproof is not to belittle or embarrass a person,  rather to show him that he has erred and that he should correct his  ways. If we directly attack the wrongdoer, there is a good chance that  we will be met with a reaction which is the opposite of what we want.  Very often, when a person is confronted concerning a transgression which  he has committed, he raises his defenses and continues to display the  malevolent behavior, in order to enforce the fact that he does not  consider such behavior to be wrong. Therefore, effective rebuke cannot  be achieved by directly challenging and attempting to belittle the  perpetrator. Accordingly, how is it possible that Yosef would choose to  reprimand them in such a manner? Another question that can be asked is:  If the rebuke relates to their lack of sensitivity towards their own  father, why did Yosef ask whether "my father" is still alive, rather  than whether "our father" or "your father" is still alive?[3]
 
 Perhaps the following explanation can be offered: One form of  effective reproof is focusing on the victim's pain rather than on the  wrongdoing of the transgressor. By not directly challenging the  perpetrator, he is not forced to raise his defenses. When he sees the  suffering that has been caused by his actions, he comes to the  understanding that he has behaved inappropriately.
 
 The fact that "Is my father still alive?" was the first question  that Yosef asked his brothers, indicates that what most concerned him  for the previous twenty-two years was being distant from his father..  His query should be interpreted as an outpouring of his own personal  grief over being in a position where it is impossible to maintain a  loving relationship with his father. The brothers were filled with  shame, not because Yosef directly chastised them, rather as a result of  understanding the grief that their actions had caused. This makes the  reason why Yosef focused on my father rather than your father clear. He  was expressing his grief over the loss of his personal relationship with  his father.
 
 1.Bereishis Rabbah 93:11 Chagiga 4b
 2.See Malbim Maharsha Chidushei Aggados Chagiga 4b
 3.See Kli Yakar 45:3
 
 Liar Liar
 
 "And they told him, saying 'Yosef is still alive. He is the ruler  of all Egypt' and his heart became numb, for he did not believe them"  (45:26)
 
 The verse states that when the brothers revealed to Yaakov that  Yosef was still alive, he did not believe them. The Midrash comments  that "such is the fate of the liar - even when conveying the truth he is  not believed".[1] Since they had lied to Yaakov earlier concerning  Yosef's fate, Yaakov refused to believe them this time. When Delilah was  attempting to discover the source of Shimshon's great strength,  Shimshon initially gave her false information. When he finally told her  the true source of his strength, the verse states that she knew  immediately that he was not lying.[2] The Talmud comments that the  reason for this is "nikarim divrei emet" - "the truth is clearly  discernable".[3] Why is it that Yaakov refused to believe his sons  because of their previous falsehood, whereas Delilah was able to discern  the truth in Shimshon's words, although he had been untruthful in the  past? How do we reconcile the axioms "such is the fate of the liar -  even when conveying the truth   he is not believed" and "the truth is clearly discernable"?
 
 There are two kinds of liars; one is a person whose sole motivation  is to mislead the listener with the falsehood that he is conveying, and  the other actually believes the falsehood to be a reality. The terms for  these two types of liars are "shakran" and "badai" respectively. The  term "badai" is also used by the Talmud to reflect certain expressions  formulated by the Sages which create a vow or oath, a new reality -  "lashon asher badu chachamim" which means "expressions formulated by the  Sages".[4]
 
 The Midrash referring to Yaakov states that such is the fate of a  badai. According to the commentaries, Yosef's brothers convened a Beis  Din which judged Yosef as guilty and sentenced him to death.[5] In their  eyes, selling Yosef to the Midianites was the manner by which to carry  out the sentence without actually having to kill Yosef with their own  hands. Therefore, when they informed Yaakov that Yosef had been killed,  they were so convinced that they had done the right thing, that they  believed that Yosef, in reality had been killed. They were sure that  Hashem must have carried out their sentence for them. Therefore, the  brothers were bada'im, they believed their own falsehoods, and  consequently, Yaakov did not believe them. The lies of a person who  believes his own falsehoods cannot be distinguished from the truth.
 
 Shimshon is described as speaking "kezav" or "sheker", when  attempting to mislead Delilah.[6] He himself did not believe the lie.  Therefore, when he told the truth, it was discernable - "nikarim divrei  emet".
 
 1. Berishis Rabbah 94:3, Sanhedrin 89a, Avos D'Rav Nosson 30
 2. Shoftim 16:18
 3. Sotah 9b
 4. Nedarim 10a
 5. See Seforno 37:25
 6. See Shoftim 16:13, Targum of kezav is sheker
 |  |  
   
 
       |  |  
                   |  |  
  | Questions or comments?  Email feedback@torah.org. 
 Join the Jewish Learning Revolution! Torah.org: The Judaism Site brings this and a host of other classes to you every                 week. Visit http://torah.org or email learn@torah.org  to get your own free copy of this mailing.
 
 
 Permission is granted to redistribute, but please give  proper attribution and copyright to the author and Torah.org.                 Both the author and Torah.org reserve certain rights.  Email  copyrights@torah.org  for full information.
 |  |  | 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment