| 
             |  |               |  |               |  |               |  |                Of Clouds and Fires       
 | Volume 25, No. 23 29 Adar I 5771
 March 5, 2011
 
 Sponsored by Elaine and Jerry Taragin in memory of Asriel Taragin a”h
 
 Howard Benn on the yahrzeit of his mother Fay Fisher Benn (Fayga Bat Alter Yitzchok Dov a”h)
 
 Today’s Learning:
 Tanach: Yechezkel 43-44
 Mishnah: Ma’aser Sheni 1:3-4
 Halachah: O.C. 634:4-636:1
 Daf Yomi (Bavli): Menachot 3
 Daf Yomi (Yerushalmi): Shabbat 22
 
 Our parashah describes the final stages of the construction of the  Mishkan, and concludes (40:38): “For the cloud of Hashem would be upon  the Mishkan by day, and fire would be on it at night, before the eyes of  all of the House of Yisrael throughout their journeys.” The Midrash  Ha’gadol relates: When Bnei Yisrael saw Hashem’s cloud resting over the  Mishkan, they rejoiced and said, “Now Hashem is pleased with us.” But,  when night fell, and a pillar of fire descended and surrounded the  Mishkan, they began to cry: “We did all of this for nothing! All that we  made will be burned in no time.” Early in the morning, when they saw  the cloud once again surrounding the Mishkan, they immediately became  exceedingly joyous, and they said, “This is a declaration before all the  nations of the world, for if they wanted to do this, they would not be  able to.” Why did G-d do all of this? Because of His great love for  Yisrael. Similarly, it is written (Shir Ha’shirim 2:3), “In His shade I d  elighted, and there I sat, and His fruit was sweet to my palate.”
 
 The midrash continues: Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmani says: Why,  regarding every aspect of the construction, does the Torah state, “As  Hashem had commanded Moshe”? This may be compared to a king who had an  agent build him a palace. The agent arose and built a large and ornate  palace, and he engraved the king’s name throughout the palace. When he  finished it, the king entered and saw it, and it was very pleasing to  him. He said, “The agent did all this for my honor! Why am I inside and  he is outside?” Similarly, when Moshe completed the work of the Mishkan,  regarding each section of which it says, “As Hashem commanded,” Hashem  appeared and rested His Shechinah in it, and it was pleasing to Him,  much as it is written (Malachi 3:4), “Then the offering of Yehuda and  Yerushalayim will be pleasing to Hashem.” He said, “The son of Amram  [i.e., Moshe] did all of this for My honor, yet he stands outside? It is  fitting that he should enter and bask in the shade of My Shechinah.”  Therefo  re, next week’s parashah begins (Vaykira 1:1), “He called to Moshe.”
 
 The midrash concludes: Until the Mishkan was built, the world was a  place of enmity, hatred, competition, incitement and disputes. After the  Mishkan was built and the Shechinah rested in it, love, brotherhood,  friendship, and justice were given to the world. May the Merciful One  bless us with peace and protect us, as it is written (Yeshayah 31:5),  “Like flying birds [appear from nowhere], so will Hashem, Master of  Legions, protect Yerushalayim, protecting and rescuing, passing over and  delivering.” And it is written (Zechariah 9:15), “Hashem, Master of  Legions, will protect them,” so may He protect His nation with His  peace.
 ********
 “Eleh pekudei / These are the reckonings of the Mishkan, the Mishkan of the Edut / Testimony . . .” (38:21)
 
 The Midrash notes that the word “Mishkan” alludes to “mashkon” /  “collateral.” The two-fold use of the word “Mishkan” at the beginning of  our parashah alludes to the two Batei Mikdash which were taken away  from us as collateral, so-to-speak, for our sins.
 
 Why should the destruction of the Bet Hamikdash be alluded to at the  time the Mishkan was being constructed? asks R’ Yosef David Sintzheim  z”l (1736-1812; Chief Rabbi of France; author of the Talmud commentary  Yad David). He answers:
 
 The Mishkan was intended to provide atonement for the sin of the  Golden Calf. The Midrash teaches that since Bnei Yisrael sinned using  the word “Eleh” / “These” (as in Shmot 32:4--“These are your gods,  Yisrael”), their atonement came through the word “Eleh” (referring to  the first word in our parashah). In the future, too, the word “Eleh”  will be used, says the Midrash, specifically referring to Yishayah  48:12–“Eleh” / “These will come from afar [at the time of the  ingathering of the Diaspora].” The commentary Yefei To’ar explains the  message of this latter Midrash to be that since Hashem said that He  would remember the sin of the Golden Calf and mete out punishment for it  a little bit at a time, we might fear that it will not be forgotten  even at the time of the future redemption. Therefore the Midrash assures  us that the atonement that began with the construction of the Mishkan  (“Eleh Pekudei”) will be completed in the future (“Eleh . . .”).
 
 R’ Sintzheim concludes, answering his original question of why the  destruction of the Bet Hamikdash should be alluded to at the time the  Mishkan was being constructed: In the interim, however, before the  atonement is complete, the sin of the Golden Calf will cause the  destruction of the two Temples. The word “pekudei” (as in our verse,  “Eleh pekudei”) means “accounting,” but it can also mean “missing.” It  refers to the two Temples that will be missing from us until the sin of  the Golden Calf is ultimately erased.
 
 Understood in this light, our verse is alluding not just to the  destruction of the two Batei Mikdash, but to the entire process of  atonement of which the Mishkan is but one part. Why is the Mishkan  called the “Mishkan of the Edut / Testimony”? Because it testifies to  the unfolding of the process just described. (Shelal David)
 
 ********
 
 “Moshe saw the entire work [of the Mishkan], and behold! They had  done it as Hashem had commanded, so had they done. And Moshe blessed  them.” (Shmot 39:43)
 
 The Midrash adds, “What was his blessing? ‘May it be G-d’s Will that the Shechinah will rest on your handiwork’.”
 
 R’ Mordechai Wulliger z”l (1895-1995; administrator at Yeshiva Torah  Voda’ath in Brooklyn, N.Y.) explains the significance of Moshe’s  blessing as follows: The Gemara teaches that one may not praise G-d  except using the formula that the Sages established. If a person would  begin to praise G-d on his own, he could never stop, for we would ask  him, “Have you exhausted all of your Master’s attributes?!” The Mishkan  was intended as a place for man to come close to G-d through prayer and  service, but how can man do that? He can never praise G-d enough! The  answer is that it is proper etiquette to not praise someone excessively  to his face. Thus, when the Shechinah is present in the Mishkan, one can  begin to praise G-d and stop. In answer to the question, “Have you  exhausted all of your Master’s attributes?” he can respond that it is  not proper to recite all of G-d’s praises to His Face, so-to-speak.  Moshe’s blessing was that the Mishkan would indeed be a place where this  would   be possible. (Tefilat Mordechai p.139)
 
 ********
 
 “He took and placed the Testimony [i.e., the Luchot] into the Aron / Ark . . .” (Shmot 40:20)
 
 R’ Shlomo Kluger z”l (1785-1869; rabbi of Brody, Galicia) notes that  our verse contains two verbs (“took” and “placed”) while the verses  relating to the other implements of the mishkan have only one verb. (For  example, verse 22 states: “He put the Table in the Ohel Mo’ed.”) Why?  R’ Kluger explains: The Gemara (Kiddushin 7a) teaches that when A gives a  gift to B, who is a distinguished person, and B accepts the gift, A is  considered to be a recipient because he is receiving a favor from B in  that B honored A by accepting the gift. This is why the Torah says  earlier (Shmot 25:2), “*Take* a donation for Me,” rather than “*Give* a  donation to Me,” because a person who is fortunate enough to give a gift  *to* Hashem actually is receiving a favor *from* Hashem.
 
 Similarly, it was an honor for Moshe to be able to put the Luchot  into the Aron. Thus, when he “placed” them, he also “took” something for  himself. (Imrei Shefer)
 
 ********
 
 “The cloud covered the Ohel Mo’ed / Tent of Meeting, and the glory of Hashem filled the Tabernacle.” (40:34)
 
 The cloud is a reference to the fact that Hashem’s presence in our  world is hidden, taught R’ Zvi Yehuda Kook z”l (1891-1982; rosh yeshiva  of Yeshivat Merkaz Harav and mentor of the National Religious Party). He  expounded further:
 
 When one sees a rainbow, he must recite a blessing. A rainbow is  multicolored; so, too, G-d is revealed in the world in many different  ways. [This is a play on the Hebrew word “gevanim” / “colors” or  “aspects.”] One is forbidden to diminish the greatness of G-d [i.e., His  ability to reveal Himself in so many different ways], but  unfortunately, this occurs both among the religious and among the  heretics.
 
 Sometimes, a brilliant flash of the Divine light occurs in the  physical world. When Avraham went to the akeidah, “he saw the cloud from  afar.” This means that Avraham saw a manifestation of the Divine with  his physical eyes. It is possible to “meet” G-d even when He appears in a  cloud; indeed, in the haftarah for Parashat Pekudei [which is not read  today because it also is Parashat Shekalim] we read, “Hashem has said  that we should dwell in the fog.” There also are clouds that lead us on  the way, just as Bnei Yisrael experienced in the desert.
 
 It is easy to sanctify G-d’s Name when one is among angels. The  uniqueness of the Jewish people, and its very purpose, is to sanctify  G-d in this world, amid its earthiness and materialism (including,  writes R’ Kook, being an active participant in the State [of Israel] and  its armed forces). This ultimately demonstrates the sanctity of Torah  study. Such is the meaning of the Vilna Gaon’s teaching that a Jew’s  soul belongs to the earth. Man’s mission is to relate G-d’s greatness in  this world, with all of its complications, as we say in the Rosh  Hashanah prayers, “You are revealed in thick clouds of purity.” (Sichot  Harav Zvi Yehuda, p. 409)
 
 ********
 
 “For the cloud of Hashem would be upon the Mishkan by day, and fire would be on it at night . . .” (40:38)
 
 R’ Yitzchak Weiss z”l Hy”d (rabbi of Verbau, Czechoslovakia; killed  in the Holocaust in 1942) writes: The Mishkan, where the Luchot were  housed, alludes to a Torah scholar. If a Torah scholar publicizes  himself, as the *day* is public, Hashem will bring a *cloud* of  obscurity over him. However, if a Torah scholar conceals himself like an  object concealed at *night*, Hashem will spread his fame as a *fire* is  seen from a distance. (Siach Yitzchak)
 |  |  
   
 
       |  |  
                   | The editors hope these brief 'snippets' will engender further study and discussion of Torah topics ('lehagdil Torah u'leha'adirah'), and your letters are appreciated. Web archives at Torah.org start with 5758 (1997) and may be retrieved from the Hamaayan page.
 
 Hamaayan needs your support! Please consider sponsoring Hamaayan in  honor of a happy occasion or in memory of a loved one. The low cost of  sponsorship is $36. Donations to HaMaayan are tax-deductible. |  
  | Questions or comments?  Email feedback@torah.org .
 
Join the Jewish Learning Revolution! Torah.org: The Judaism Site brings this and a host of other classes to you every                 week. Visit http://torah.org  or email learn@torah.org  to get your own free copy of this mailing. 
 
Permission is granted to redistribute, but please give  proper attribution and copyright to the author and Torah.org.                 Both the author and Torah.org reserve certain rights.  Email copyrights@torah.org  for full information.  |  |  | 
No comments:
Post a Comment